4 thoughts on “Which of Zhou Dafu diamond ring to buy? Intersection”
Kenneth
There is no cost -effectiveness under one carat, it is a thing.
This stones are not cost -effective, not the problem of stone. Weekly sells rings, including brand, design, precepts, and diamonds. Therefore, you can't just use stones to judge cost -effectiveness. If you care about the quality of the stone, buy naked diamond yourself.
If you don't care much about money, buy high net degree, D-E color and F-G color, it is difficult to distinguish the naked eye, unless the white card paper is used as a background for comparison, but the clarity Si can be caught. If the naked eye is distinguished, it is recommended to have a clarity at least VS, ideal VVS2.
If it was me, I would not buy these two. Although the first clarity and color are not bad, the drill is small, not worth 12800. In the second, the color and clarity have dropped grades. Although the drill is slightly larger, it is not as high as 3800.
There is no cost -effectiveness under one carat, it is a thing.
This stones are not cost -effective, not the problem of stone. Weekly sells rings, including brand, design, precepts, and diamonds. Therefore, you can't just use stones to judge cost -effectiveness. If you care about the quality of the stone, buy naked diamond yourself.
If you don't care much about money, buy high net degree, D-E color and F-G color, it is difficult to distinguish the naked eye, unless the white card paper is used as a background for comparison, but the clarity Si can be caught. If the naked eye is distinguished, it is recommended to have a clarity at least VS, ideal VVS2.
If it was me, I would not buy these two. Although the first clarity and color are not bad, the drill is small, not worth 12800. In the second, the color and clarity have dropped grades. Although the drill is slightly larger, it is not as high as 3800.
Hum, I don't want to explain more, absolutely the first cost -effective.
The one above is good, the one is not clear below